Skip to main content
Update
Non-financial boards have been closed.

Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon.

Fool.com | The Motley Fool Community
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
How about a system in which the loser pays the court costs up to the amount he spent on pursuing his cause of action?

I don't think it could be as simple as that. You could run very inexpensive attacks on very complicated issues where there are deep pockets, and you would be ahead if even 1 out of 30 managed to stick to the wall when you threw it.

I think judges already have a lot of developed systems for awarding lawyers fees in a broad range of cases. I would suggest just continuing that expertise over to the "loser pays" cases without any change.

So the losing attorney doesn't get a bill from either party to the suit, she gets a bill from the court.

R:
Print the post  

Announcements

When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.