Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
I agree with lance2210 but for different reasons.
Personally I feel you could be better off with a portfolio of actively managed funds.
Index funds are forced to sell perfectly good stocks if the are temporarily out of favour with the market and then buy them back at higher prices when they come back into favour. Doesn't make sense to me.
A lot of Australia's blue chips are undervalued at the moment and the index managers would have had to sell these down even though they are approaching bargain basement levels.
If index funds became too big a part of the market they could end up becoming market makers instead of the market followers that they are meant to be.I think it is doubtful that their investment philosophy would work under these circumstances.Depends on their timeframe I suppose, but as you increase the timeframe you also increase the risk.
I know a lot of people will disagree with me, its just my opinion, but personally I feel a top down,bottom up approach is a lot better.
Check out Colonial First State new Global Tech and Communications Fund. 70%+ since November 1st.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.