Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0

I clearly don't believe that there were 230k new farm jobs, after looking at the statistically significant description that they used in their own survey 230k is easily accounted for in their 90% probability of being within 290k of the number.

The 230k number is bogus because you were using inconsistent data. You should not believe it because it is wrong, not because of the accuracy of the survey. 

However that still leaves the question of why there was such a large increase in the total Not in Labor Force Statistic.

Not really. If you have no faith in the accuracy of the unemployment data, you should have the same reservations about the Not In Labor Force data.

Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.