No. of Recommendations: 13
I don't think the "get a job" or "let them starve" approach has much merit.

We can do better.

If you want to go that route, I think we pretty much have to go with a UBI. It could replace a lot of social programs. If a justification for SS is so that the elderly won't starve (or "have to eat cat food"), shouldn't that same consideration be provided to everyone?


On a related note, Denmark used to have 5 years of unemployment benefits. Oddly enough, most people got new jobs either in the first several months or the last several months of that 5-year period. So they shortened it to 4 years. After several years of seeing the same pattern, they decided to cut it in half, to 2 years.

So, from their perspective, the "let them starve" attitude seemed to motivate a lot of people. As long as they had an income, they appeared to have little incentive to "get a job".
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.