Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
I have to agree with dfaiella. If you are looking to get a loan, then under the right circumstances I think a 401k is an appropriate place. The double taxation argument is irrelevant except for buying a house. The choice is between paying interest to your 401k loan where it will later be taxed, or paying it to some other lending institution where it is just gone.

To me it seems that the only difference between a 401k and another type of loan is the risk associated with job security, and the opportunity cost of not having the money invested elsewhere. In the specific case that dfaiella mentioned, the opportunity cost was minimized because fixed income securities were used to pay for the loan, which is itself just another type of fixed income security.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.