Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 1
I know this post is late in a past conversation, but wouldn't he stand (as an investor with more than 5 million shares in his possesion and as a professional with a career to promote) to lose more if he were construed to bilk FARO of comparative side change on the lease of his property? Remember that a $5 loss in FARO's share value would mean more than $25,000,000 to Raab.


The lease doesn't appear to be outrageously expensive anyway. I guess my point is that he stands to lose too much for too little by over-billing the company for who's bottom line he is ultimately responsible. It's not like he'd be able to go Enron on us and exponentially improve his net-worth with something like that.


I appreciate that being brought out though b/c I had no idea it was even going on to begin with.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.