No. of Recommendations: 4
I say make the younger generations wait longer to obtain benefits.

I disagree with you. If we put the issue of privatization for the young aside, any benefit cuts, including waiting longer to obtain them, should be across the board. I think this whole perspective of dividing our nation by age is exactly that, divisive.

If the retirement age is increased, the ongoing benefits of those who are collecting today should be adjusted downward to reflect the additional amount they received by retiring 'early'. This is particularly pertinent to those who started collecting at 62.

If benefits are to be reduced 10% to those not yet collecting, the same should be done for those already collecting. I don't believe that the randomness of what year one was born should have any pertinence in determining whose benefits should be cut and whose should not. It makes no sense whatsoever. Bush's promise to not cut benefits for those over 55 was strictly a political move, and has no foundation in common sense.

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.