No. of Recommendations: 0
I think the real issue here, once again, is that if you offer government protection on investments, you have to regulate what is done with the money. When the deregulated S&Ls, some of them went out of control and then went bust, in ways that were predictable. The taxpayer lost. For the most part, the bank executives won (with a few exceptions of blatant lawbreaking). Most of the subprime and almost all of the "toxic" semi-prime mortgages were not held by the mortgage brokers and lenders, but packaged and resold, most with quasi government protection (via Fannie and Freddy), and even the worst are being protected by the Fed bailout. (I would help homeowners who could pay a reasonably priced mortgage on fair value on their homes who were sold misleading mortgages directly at the expense of those who invested in these mortgages.)
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.