Skip to main content
This Board Has Moved

This board has been migrated to our new platform! Check out the new home page at discussion.fool.com or click below to go directly to the new Board on the new site.

Go to the New Site
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 17
I understand Jim’s point wrt buybacks, however retirement of 3-4% of shares annually over time seems like it would become meaningful to earnings per share and market value.

Buffett seems to like such buybacks over extended periods for the stocks he buys. Long term, your ownership increases.

But let's be honest. The short term impact on shareholders is that Buffett demonstrates by actions that he believes the stock is undervalued - which provides a modest bump to it being less undervalued.

It's about the only way he sends such a signal to the marketplace. Otherwise, he avoids such as much as possible. And has specifically stated that he would never do so to support the price of the stock. As he has demonstrated in downturns by lack of action.

So he does so only when the lack of other opportunities and the pressure of excess cash makes it acceptable in his eyes.

And the market reads it as such - to the benefit of those in the dispersal phase of ownership.

Being such, I hope it continues.
Print the post  

Announcements

When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.