Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
I was with you until the last sentence. Wouldn't not allowing them to work full time make them employers? I guess they could word the contract so that the only time there was space available was for less than full time.

They are not employers, because they do not pay the dancers. The dancers pay them. I do not know why they do not allow full time work. Perhaps they want more different faces during the week than they would get if they had a smaller full time group of girls. Or perhaps there is some law that regulates people who work over 25 hours a week.

There is no contract. The dancer shows up each evening and the owner either accepts their $75 and allows them to perform, or refuses it and does not allow them to perform.
Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.