No. of Recommendations: 1
I've watched a couple of his debates, and he *appears* to win on a superficial level, because he tends to be deliberately dishonest with his choice of words and their intended meanings.

And he's delivered the same arguments so many times that he's very smooth and refined.

But if you listen to the content, the fallacies are evident. A sharp opponent picks up on these and rebuts him accordingly. What's amazing is he continues undeterred, as if the opponent didn't say a word (well, he will pick bits to reply to, but never the meat of the challenge to his fallacies because he can't win those).

One of his favorites is Kalam. Setting aside that the premises are dubious, he still makes the leap from "cause" to "an uncaused creator god" without logical justification. Basically, "it must be". Argument from ignorance.

Just as an example.
Print the post  

Announcements

When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.