No. of Recommendations: 0
If it isn't too much work, how does reducing the "harshness" of this assumption impact the conclusions? What if it's only reduced by 1/3 per year, or 1/4? Does that have a material impact on the model's conclusion?

Hi Fletch,

Oh certainly it does. I don't have the model in front of me, but the whole thing depends on the amount of incremental MW installed each year. If the drop in growth rate each year is less than 50% (33% or 25% drop a year, as you proposed), then more incremental MW of systems would be installed each year than currently modeled. That ultimately means more RV growth and a higher total in 2017 (the last year of the model). And that means a higher projected share price a few years down the road, assuming the rest of the model stays constant.

When building a model, I'd rather be too pessimistic and therefore pleasantly surprised by actual results, than be too lax (thinking I might be more "realistic") and be disappointed. But then, given our human propensity to overconfidence, even being "harsh" I'm probably not conservative enough. :-)

Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.