No. of Recommendations: 2

If the problem is lagging consumer demand, you give the stimulus to people who spend it (i.e., poor people.)

And, in fact, we did that in part back in 2008 with the Fiscal Stimulus Plan.

There probably are few more effective ideas than simply giving money back to the populace. The only reason question is all at once or over time - which has the bigger impact on GDP, inflation, etc.

Who thinks we should do this again before a zero feds fund rate is explored.
Print the post  


This is a Politics Free Board
Politically charged posts are not permitted on the Metar Board. If you make a political post, and it is alerted, the post will be removed. Thanks!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.