Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
If you are saying that the IDiots have no case, I think you are a little harsh. If you are saying the case is not ready for prime time, well thats a different story. One thing I've noticed in the discussions here, is when creationist try to make a case for the "scientific" nature of ID, playing by science's rules, the line keeps getting moved.

The line is not being moved, the line is the same for every branch of science. Refer again to the post about the scientific method, which has been the same since Roger Bacon. The steps are:

1. Observe.
2. Hypothesize.
3. Predict.
4. Test your prediction.

I appreciate the fact that you're trying to play by science's rules, but frankly, what you've offered is not cutting it. The predictions you have suggested so far are either things that are already known, or are not testable and hence do not make it to step 4.
Print the post  

Announcements

When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.