Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
In the case of business interest (pub 535), I agree with you. A replacement business loan generates business interest. In the case of home mortgage interest, I also agree; a refi that secures the same home is treated as a substitute for the acquisition (or HEL) debt that is extinguished in the payoff. In the case of investment interest, though, I don't see any authority for the proposition that a borrowing that is used to extinguish a liability that generates investment expense substitutes for that liability and is treated as though it was incurred to make the investment. Extinguishing a debt is not making an investment, so borrowing to extinguish a debt should not give rise to investment expense. I could be wrong, and the odds are greatly in favor of your being right. But I've looked at Pub 550, and I still don't see it.
Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.