A question about the IRS voiding an IRA:I've just had an elightening discussion about over-contributing to an IRA with TMFPixy ('Maximum IRA Contribution for 2?' thread on the 'Retirement Investing' Board, first post#14445). In a nutshell, there's a 6% penalty for every dollar contributed over the max (i.e. 2K), every year. So a $3,000 contribution in one year gets hit with a 60$/yr penalty.However, the earnings aren't penalized, which means that a penalized over-contribution could still be more profitable than investing in a taxable account, given a high enough capital gain tax rate, and a high enough return on the investment. For example, after 8 years, a 20% return will make more money being penalized in an IRA than it will being hit with a 20% long-term capital gain in a taxable account (the amount invested here is not relevant). It would also be 40% larger after 20 years, and 100% larger after 30 years. That's a very large factor to consider in long-term retirement investing.TMFPixy wondered if the experts here would know if the IRS would let someone get away with this, and if a broker would even allow this to happen. Even if I dilligently paid my penalties, would I just be screaming for an audit and a revocation of my IRA? Your advice is appreciated.
First, your IRA trustee isn't supposed to accept anything over $2000 per year contribution on behalf of any individual. The excess contribution rulings are aimed at situations where even $2000 is an excess contribution or at incorrect rollovers.If you want to read relative information about this issue, I suggest you look up the following:IR Code 408 (d), (e)*IRS Letter Ruling 9633041 5/21/96 IRS Letter Ruling 9339024 7/7/93Revenue Ruling 86-103, 1986-2 C.B. 62Revenue Ruling 85-62, 1985-1 C.B. 153
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |