the Green party’s presidential candidate, is prepared to request recounts of the election result in several key battleground states, her campaign said on Wednesday.Stein launched an online fundraising page seeking donations toward a $2m fund she said was needed to request reviews of the results in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Stein said she was acting due to “compelling evidence of voting anomalies” and that data analysis had indicated “significant discrepancies in vote totals”. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/jill-stein-e...Robert
Why would she care since she was on the ticket and what votes Stein did get would have been taken from Hillary most likely.What? Now she wants to hand over her votes to Hillary? Hillary already won the popular vote, does she think the recount would give her the electoral vote too?
What? Now she wants to hand over her votes to Hillary? Hillary already won the popular vote, does she think the recount would give her the electoral vote too?The vote in several key states is very close. Many voting machines have a paper trail. In my state, we use paper ballots that are fed into an electric machine. A vote count would compare the paper ballots to the electronic count. If the the machine was programmed properly, the paper and electronic count will match. If someone tampered with the computer program, it would show up as well. So yes, it could give her the electoral vote as well. There were anomalies in the numbers reported by electronic voting machines versus paper voting machines. Maybe it's a coincidence, maybe not. Why not check it and see?AW
Time and money. It's not going to happen.There is no going back, even prez0 said it's over.The fat lady sang her song...
The key reason is to ensure the voting is not tampered with. The voting machines are pretty ripe for hacking and it is important we count them to make sure they are not hacked.
Time and money. It's not going to happen.Well, she's collected enough money to pay for 1 of the 3 states and is well on her way for the second. If material discrepancies are found in one state, this could blow up pretty quickly.If no discrepancies, no harm. It validates the results.AW
stein feels guilty, now a front woman stooge for the clinton machine....
The key reason is to ensure the voting is not tampered with. The voting machines are pretty ripe for hacking and it is important we count them to make sure they are not hacked. ...bullsheet you want clinton...cripes do any of you have the ability to speak your honest intentions.
If material discrepancies are found in one state, this could blow up pretty quickly.___________________Trump won Michigan.Stein helped Trump to win taking vote away from Hillary.Probably feels guilty and or getting pressure from the Clinton camp to push the recount.http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/11/23/donald-t...
I don't care about Clinton. This election had seen unprecedented hacking and intervention by foreign powers. That's what it is about.
Just funny how republicans wanted to look at the voting stuff BEFORE the election and all of sudden AFTER the election the Democrats are whining like stuck pigs. I am pretty sure it is not just folks who thought ill of Democrats before this election are noticing so all I ask is, please keep up the good work!
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |