The 10 Most Recent Messages By TMFShadowDragon
Take me
back to where I was.
-
Date: 6/15/22 1:02 PM
-
Number: 11
-
Recommendations: 0
Hi,
Here we are 6 months on...little did I know when I posted my thoughts in the original post that the Partnership Portfolio (PP) would come out almost immediately with a sell. As one might expect in my thoughts in that post, I wasn't
(Continued...)
-
Date: 6/2/22 4:54 PM
-
Number: 712
-
Recommendations: 2
Hi Paul,
I wanted to respond and have been wrestling with the best way to do so - alas, not with a lot of success; so perhaps I should just jump in with a few comments which you may wish to pursue or not.
First some
(Continued...)
-
Date: 5/13/22 12:52 PM
-
Number: 779
-
Recommendations: 0
Oops - I didn't finish the title on my previous post before I posted it. I had meant to qualify the "personal perspective" to investing and having done so as a Fool member for nearly 25 years.
Oh well, I can't edit it
(Continued...)
-
Date: 5/13/22 12:48 PM
-
Number: 778
-
Recommendations: 1
Hi,
I'm posting this under the "Just Ask" board not because anyone asked but because it was the most appropriate Partnership Portfolio board.
It's been a tough year to date - and, as we are all very much aware,
(Continued...)
-
Date: 3/24/22 9:46 AM
-
Number: 677
-
Recommendations: 7
Latest blog entry by David Bradbury, Okta Chief Security Officer.
(Continued...)
-
Date: 1/25/22 9:47 AM
-
Number: 651
-
Recommendations: 2
Hi Paul,
Yes, I did miss your point.
With regards to your question about "business as usual" for TMF, I'd be very surprised if the focus shifted from a focus on business strength as that should (must?) include
(Continued...)
-
Date: 1/23/22 12:13 PM
-
Number: 649
-
Recommendations: 1
Hi Paul,
Yes, it was called the
dot.com bubble.
No need to go into details, one only need look at the NASDAQ index. It hit a high of 4698 in May 2000 and subsequently fell to a low of 1108 in Sept
(Continued...)
-
Date: 1/21/22 11:06 AM
-
Number: 13726
-
Recommendations: 1
Hi Bruiser,
You are quite right that there is a time issue and what one's money could earn while waiting for they $95 buy out which is why I discounted the $95. I didn't do so in an elegant manner as I just wanted a ball park idea
(Continued...)
-
Date: 1/19/22 9:10 PM
-
Number: 13710
-
Recommendations: 5
Hi Boris,
One way to look at it is to see how the market is pricing the potential buyout.
Assuming that if the buyout fails the price would fall back to $64 +/-, and ignoring the time value of money (i.e., how long a buyout would
(Continued...)
-
Date: 1/19/22 2:40 PM
-
Number: 13705
-
Recommendations: 1
Gee....sorry for all the typos and other errors in my post. I stopped at six. I can do better than that - really. Reviewing and editing was never one of my strengths. :)
Total = 10Take me
back to where I was.