No. of Recommendations: 6
<<Bernstein is saying that he looks at things that have not occurred in the past to make his future estimates of safety.>>

He does not say any such thing, markr33. He is saying that to limit yourself to "looking at the past" in the manner that intercst did produces misleading results. You have to incorporate other factors into the equation, factors like the overvaluation of stock prices.


OK, I agree that it might be prudent to take into account factors such as overvaluation of stock prices. Would you suggest using P/E or perhaps 10-year average P/E as a measurement of overvaluation ?

If that is the case, you really ought to look at the latest RE spreadsheet which incorporates these concepts as well. See -

http://rehphome.tripod.com/re60.html

for more information.

It really is remarkable, but it appears that reacting to valuation changes only reduces the historically safe withdrawal rate (HSWR) !

See post -

http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=18082857

for more information. The thread starts here -

http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=18082408

Also see the thread starting at -

http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=18128601

for an even more interesting analysis of treatment of high, medium, and low P/E which might even raise the HSWR slightly.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.