Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 0
Unfortunately, if the bar is set too high, the money saved won't be very much. We read that only ~3.5% of American families are worth more than 1 Million, so cutting benefits off at 1 Million assets would only save 3.5%.

This is an intersting point Cliff and brings up several problems with how you decide who gets the SS benefits and those that don't. How would the government calculate your net worth? Would it include real estate and pensions?

The system isn't set up to tax assets, and I don't think Social Security would be means tested that way. It would be based on income. It's already partially means tested, since low income people receive a higher rate for calculating benefits and Social Security is included for income tax purposes above a certain income. Just more of the same.

And I'd have a fairly low threshhold for reducing benefits too.

Once Social Security is reduced to a welfare program for the poor, instead of a welfare program for the middle class, its magic with the voters will go away.

Seattle Pioneer
Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.