No. of Recommendations: 1
<<Ho K. Nieh, director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, offered a quick look at the demographics of the NRC staff. “In February of this year,” he said, “with roughly 2,900 staff on board, we have 24% of our staff eligible to retire now, 38% eligible in three years, and 42% eligible in four years.” The agency increasingly consists of a diminishing number of very experienced staff and an increasing number of new employees, with few in the middle to fill the ranks of future project managers and agency leaders.>>

I'm supposing that Federal aircraft safety regulators have similar numbers. As I've suggested, this implies that government lacks the number of qualified employees able to supervise the development of A safe aircraft, let along ALL the aircraft under development in the United States and abroad.

Would US government employees take responsibility for supervising the safety of aircraft developed in Canada, the EU or China? Or do you suppose the USA government, Canadian government, Chinese government and EU should all be independently supervising the safety of jet aircraft wherever they are built?

Seattle Pioneer
Print the post  


This is a Politics Free Board
Politically charged posts are not permitted on the Metar Board. If you make a political post, and it is alerted, the post will be removed. Thanks!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.