Skip to main content
This Board Has Moved

This board has been migrated to our new platform! Check out the new home page at discussion.fool.com or click below to go directly to the new Board on the new site.

Go to the New Site
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 4
<<I would refuse to pay and redirect that money to savings for a tankless water heater.
>>


I'm constantly amazed at the enthusiasm for tankless water heaters, which aren't especially practical for many American homes and American tastes.

It takes a LOT of energy to heat water, so you either have to have a boiler with a large input or be satisfied to have varying and reduced water temperatures when varying water demands are placed on a tankless water heater/boiler.

Most American homes have widely varying demand for hot water, including several bathrooms, dishwaher, washing machine and so on. Unless you are satisfied to have the water temperature change widely as these demands are turned on or off, a conventional tank water heater is better for most people.

I guess that's why 98% of homes have 'em.



Seattle Pioneer
Print the post  

Announcements

Disclaimer - Please Read
A message about professional advice.
Useful Resources
Our Home Center has all you need to make buying and owning a home a great experience. Get or refinance a mortgage and much more!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.