No. of Recommendations: 1
My problem with a backtest of this sort is the introduction of an arbitrary holding period. While people do make money with strategies that hold for one year, I think that the backtests are not likely to be reliable.

Also, of course, I would like to know how the ranking of the stocks was done.

The strategy here: seems to me to be a bit more likely to be reliable, since the holding period is shorter. Of course it will cost you more in taxes. And I believe that Zacks ranking methodology is public, although I do not know what it is. I do believe I read a description once a few years ago. That should be investigated further. I have not looked at Zacks for quite a while.

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.