No. of Recommendations: 4
Why the Housing Bubble Tanked the Economy And the Tech Bubble Didn’t
In 2000, the dot-com bubble burst, destroying $6.2 trillion in household wealth over the next two years.

Five years later, the housing market crashed, and from 2007 to 2009, the value of real estate owned by U.S. households fell by nearly the same amount — $6 trillion.1

Despite seeing similar nominal dollar losses, the housing crash led to the Great Recession, while the dot-com crash led to a mild recession. Part of this difference can be seen in consumer spending. The housing crash killed retail spending, which collapsed 8 percent from 2007 to 2009, one of the largest two-year drops in recorded American history.2 The bursting of the tech bubble, on the other hand, had almost no effect at all; retail spending from 2000 to 2002 actually increased by 5 percent.

So of course you are dealing with the first Bush/Cheney recession in 2001 and then the second Bush/Cheney recession in 2008. Mild recession (?) vs. what was really a brief depression. Retail spending, fine, what about jobs since we are talking about the poor and the working class.

Total non-farm

six years 2002 through 2007 about +7.6 million net new payrolls

six years 2009 through 2014 about +5.6 million

Of course the big difference is 2001/02 only dropped about 2.7 million payrolls while 2009/09 dropped about 8.6 million payrolls. Why would economists even call both a "recession"? They are qualitatively different.

All the more remarkable that 2001 through 2008 only +2.1 net new payrolls while 2009 through 2016 +11.3 million net new payrolls. The "mild" recession of 2001 dragged right through the next Bush/Cheney recession while it is amazing to see the strength of the rebound after what fivethirtyeight calls a much more severe recession for the poor and working class. Credit who/what you might.

Retail spending is one measure, by the measure of jobs and wages for the working class the rebound from the second Bush/Cheney recession is order of magnitudes larger.

Anyway, those are the only two recessions of the 21st century. Gives no comfort that the low level punditry/economists(?) like Laffer and Kudlow and Moore fully 100% supported the policies that led to the two Bush/Cheney recessions, so very different, this century. Of course now they fully 100% support the Trump/Ryan policies and assure us of many good things to come. No comfort at all.

Chris Hill
Jan 18, 2018 at 4:55PM
In this MarketFoolery podcast, host Chris Hill and Motley Fool Asset Management's Bill Barker dissect some of the day's top business stories, starting with more chatter about a potential breakup of General Electric (NYSE:GE) and why Wall Street doesn't seem happy about it.

Very good discussion imo of the American disaster that is General Electric. Waded in at $18 and right back out in deciding to raise cash. If it was a flop for Buffett and Berkshire along with so many others I don't know any better. Value trap doesn't even begin to describe it.
Print the post  


This is a Politics Free Board
Politically charged posts are not permitted on the Metar Board. If you make a political post, and it is alerted, the post will be removed. Thanks!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.