Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon.
Note that ID provides no such explanation or prediction. To explain the observed changes in evolutionary rate ID has to resort to theology, which further indicate its deficiencies as a scientific theory. At least you consider it a scientific theory, even if deficient :-)Why should ID need to deal with such predictions? You make it sound like ID is supposed to be a total replacement for the theory of evolution. It's not.Bryan
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |