Skip to main content
Update
Non-financial boards have been closed.

Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon.

Fool.com | The Motley Fool Community
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 24
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/25/doing-the-math-obama-r...

In the 12 quarters since the Obama recovery started, real GDP has climbed 6.7%. That’s below even the GDP growth rate in the 12 quarters after the 1980 recession ended — despite the fact that there was the intervening deep and prolonged 1981-82 recession.

The picture isn’t any better when looking at job growth.

Obama often boasts that the economy has added 5.2 million private-sector jobs in the 31 months since employment bottomed out in February 2010. But that rate of job growth lags every previous recovery as well if, as Obama does, you start counting at the point where jobs bottomed out.

Bush oversaw 5.3 million new private-sector jobs in the 31 months after employment hit bottom in mid-2003. Under Reagan, private-sector jobs climbed 8.2 million during a comparable time period.

What’s more, Obama’s recovery has reclaimed only about half the jobs lost during the recession. That’s a far cry from prior recoveries, which saw the number of jobs exceed the previous peak by this point.

What about the “inherited mess” argument? Merline points to two studies that say the financial crisis had little to do with the nature of the recovery:

In fact, an October 2011 paper by the Atlanta Fed concluded that “U.S. history provides no support for linking low employment and high unemployment in the current recovery with the financial crisis of 2007—2008.”

And a November 2011 paper by economists at Rutgers University and the Cleveland Fed concluded that while recessions tied to financial crises tend to be deeper than average, the recoveries also tend to be stronger than average.

Study co-author Michael Bardo noted that, based on these findings, “the slow recovery that we are experiencing from the recession that ended in July 2009 is an exception to the historical pattern.”
------------------------------------------------------
History will not be kind to Mr. Obama. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
Well, who ya gonna believe? FMNH? Or your own lyin' eyes?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
History will not be kind to Mr. Obama.

Especially since, if Romney is elected, the trajectory of labor force participation will dramatically change for the better starting on January 20.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
twopairfullhouse wrote: Especially since, if Romney is elected, the trajectory of labor force participation will dramatically change for the better starting on January 20.

Possibly even before that. All the country needs is the certainty on November 6 that NObama is on his way out. THEN the recovery starts.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 3
"The Obama campaign has finally released the transcript of his endorsement interview with the Des Moines Register--and it is clear why they were reluctant to do so: the President says he has "absolutely" no regrets about ignoring the economy during the first two years of his term, when Democrats controlled Congress....."

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/24/Obama-No-...
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
You should do more on TMF than just post. They put up numbers yesterday that show how completely wrong, or twisted, your numbers are.
Print the post Back To Top