No. of Recommendations: 0
The president’s crackerjack bureaucrats required an impressive 18 pages just to define what a full-time employee is.

18 pages ????? ????? ????? ???


For the purpose of health care benefits:
Who is my full time employee? => Someone that works 30 hours per week and gets a paycheck from me.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/12/obamacare-ta...
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 5
One of the biggest impacts will probably the increased difficulty of getting a full-time job. Companies are already working to get many of their employees below 30 hours a week to avoid the ObamaCare mandate.

This will be especially problematic for low-paying jobs, so now low-paid employees can thank ObamaCare for reduced hours to go with their low wages.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 31
One of the biggest impacts will probably the increased difficulty of getting a full-time job. Companies are already working to get many of their employees below 30 hours a week to avoid the ObamaCare mandate.

This will be especially problematic for low-paying jobs, so now low-paid employees can thank ObamaCare for reduced hours to go with their low wages.
------------------------------------------------
There's estimates that put the number of uninsured higher after the mandate, because some companies will drop the insurance they offer because Obamacare says it isn't good enough so they pay the penalty instead and the workers get dumped on Medicaid, but Medicaid doesn't have to cover single adults without children, and with the increased amount of workers being dumped on Medicaid, they won't cover them. So then there will be cries for more government involvement. To think this whole new entitlement was started, when you strip away people who can afford insurance making $50,000-$75,000 but don't buy it, young adults who think they're invincible and don't buy it, and people here illegally, when all that's stripped away you're looking at 10-15 million people, divide that into 50 states and it could've been taken care of alot more economically than this huge boondoggle that makes everyone elses coverage change. That leads me to believe this really wasn't about healthcare at all. It's about creating more dependents and control. Now, i understand people can disagree with me on that......but then you'd be wrong now wouldn't you? Exactly.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Companies are already working to get many of their employees below 30 hours a week to avoid the ObamaCare mandate.

As me mudder used to say, "You made your bed, not lay in it."

Let them eat cake!
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
OOps, "now lay in it."
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
OOps, "now lay in it."

OOps, "now lie in it."

--fleg, Pedant of the Day
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
OOps, "now lay in it."

OOps, "now lie in it."

--fleg, Pedant of the Day


I'd rather get a lay than to lie.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
obama re-engineering America.

A nation of Temps.

Way to go Rookie.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
obama re-engineering America.

A nation of Temps.

Way to go Rookie
_________________________

What could go wrong?

We are currently witnessing Obama's brilliant re-engineering of US policy in the Middle East, he really needed to kow tow to those damn Republican or any one else's ideas there.

looking good
Print the post Back To Top