Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
Of those two, I would lean towards the Z3. That generation of SLK was regarded as being pretty soft (as roadsters go). The BMW (particularly the 2.8) outperforms the Mercedes pretty handily if that's something you care about.

Pros/Cons from edmunds:

1999 Z3
Pros: These are some of the best cars available. Great engine choices, superb steering and brakes, and reasonable prices make Z3 cars stand out among offerings from Mercedes-Benz and Porsche.
Cons: Limited trunk space means that you will always travel light. Small gas tank means that you will stop frequently for fuel.

1999 SLK
Pros: Good looking and spunky, this is the only convertible on the market to feature the all-weather protection of a retractable hardtop.
Cons: Performance lags behind the BMW Z3 and Porsche Boxster. Cabin is uncomfortable for exceptionally tall people.

There are a few other roadsters with similar used pricing from those model years. I'd take a look at the Miata (actually less $, you could go newer), S2000, Boxster, or even the BMW M (a little more $).
Print the post  


Disclaimer - Please Read
A message about professional advice.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.