Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
Oh how that begs to be made fun of...

Yes, yes it does. Although in this case I actually do think NJ gets it better than federal, although the form is more confusing.

On federal, if you were to make enough money combined to push you into the marriage-penalty realm, having two people do "married withhold as single" would still come up short. To makeup for it you'd have to manually pick a # of dollars extra to withhold.

On the NJ form, at least they have a fairly easy table to use that helps you pick A through E, for people who wouldn't really know to add extra or how to calculate it.

But I *am* right, right? There should be no reason they couldn't make the change. They implied that she wasn't *allowed* to make the change until actually married, but our filing status for this year *will* be MFJ, so we are allowed (legally, etc) to make the change now, right? (My HR had no issue with it)

Nonethless, my fiance is a bit of a conflict avoider, so we went the non-conflict route and I gave her a copy that said 'single' with zero allowances and a bit of extra withholding. Same diff.
Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.