Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 1

The numbers a 'value' investor needs are no less --and no more-- available than those needed by 'growth' investors, because both come from the same financial statements. Either the company has enough history to calculate ratios and to plot trends, or it doesn't, which is where naïve growth investors get themselves into trouble. Due to lacking hard evidence, they concoct a narrative that "explains" why their darling idea is "the next big thing".

Second, no number has any meaning out of context. A value investor most never heard of, Marty Whitman, makes that point continuously. E.g., a PE of 7 isn't cheap unless its industry peers in normal times average higher numbers, and that lower number isn't an invitation to buy. It's a red flag that needs to be investigated. Ditto higher than average PEs. Ditto "average" PEs. There's nothing about a company's financials that can be accepted at face value.

But the "average" investor doesn't want to do basic due diligence. He/she just wants to be told what to buy, and you know how well that typically ends.

Why might 'growth' investing --currently-- seems easier? Because of the Greenspan put (or the Bernanke put, or the Powell put), not because vetting "growth companies is easier.

Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.