No dirty wordsNo dirty picturesJust someone who can't handle innuendo...-- Tony
No dirty wordsNo dirty picturesJust someone who can't handle innuendo...-- Tony Prolly no one from here. I'd guess it is someone who wants to be a whiney butt. There is always revenge of friday nite, tho! hehe
It amazes me that TMF would pull that thread! It was definitely stock related since we were talking about companies involved in the porn business.Isn't that the biggest money maker on the web? Isn't porn an "industry" just like the rest?I would like a public response from TMF as to why that thread was pulled.
LameIf it was my poast, there was a disclaimer. Some people suck. JMHO.Disclaimer: If the word suck offended anyone, too bad. LOLsnowpimp
That was a pretty mild post compared to some on TMF! I think it had 4 recs before I logged off. Glad you wrote it anyway Tony. It made me laugh in the midst of chart mania last night.
LameIf it was my poast, there was a disclaimer. Some people suck. JMHO.Disclaimer: If the word suck offended anyone, too bad. LOLsnowpimp Awwwwww, poor baby :-(It was a cool post. dont be sad. Let's find out from tippy if it was her doing or if some uncool person problem posted it.
>"Just someone who can't handle innuendo..."Innuendo" - is that Italian for "suppository"?jscott
Awwwwww, poor baby :-(It was a cool post. dont be sad. Let's find out from tippy if it was her doing or if some uncool person problem posted it. Hi everyone,I thought you guys didn't talk about porn or anything like that here ;) Someone did complain about it so I pulled it for being off-topic. I can hear you all saying "off topic"! No flames ~ please.If you can keep the thread clean, please repost the poll.Best,Kim
I didn't realize the thread was not "clean." I thought it was a discussion of the morality of investing/trading a stock that represents a company involved in pornography. I don't remember anything dirty about it.Could you possibly let us know what was objectionable so we don't make the same mistake? It's a valid subject stock-wise considering the money being made out there.
If you can keep the thread clean...Kim...I'd sure like to know which part of that whole thread could be considered "unclean". Sheesh!!!!!Sandy
Peter Lynch always said you should invest in those areas that you are most familiar with.Will someone please give those porn URLs.LOL,Moonbounce
"Peter Lynch always said you should invest in those areas that you are most familiar with.Will someone please give those porn URLs."ROFLMAOI just stick to the videos.SP
...so we don't make the same mistake?Mistake? What mistake, Cal? The language was clean, the topic was ON and the concept (the morality of trading "immoral" stocks) was novel. Some friggin' littly prude out there just got bent outta shape over the word "porn", is my guess, and Tippy used no judgement at all in reacting to the complaint...a trial by one, as it were. I wonder if she even read the thread!Sandy
Well, I was trying to be nice while waiting for NITE to finish messing with SBAS. :)I would like to know the content that caused the objection however. No matter what anyone does there will always be porn out there and censoring this forum due to one individuals complaint sure as h e double-toothpicks won't stop it.
Tony:I saw the poll, but a lot people probably didn't because of the late hour it was posted. As a public service to fellow Denites, would you please repost it, so everyone can participate?jscott
Ooooh! Ooooooh! YOU SAID "h e double toothpicks"I'm gonna tell!!! ;)Next thing you know, someone is going to say "gol blangit" or "dab frammit" and we'll all be in trouble!Anyway, thanks for the support, folks -- I'll repost the poll AH.-- Tony
Someone did complain about it so I pulled it for being off-topic. Tippy,Thanks for addressing the Den. If the problem post was from someone who *used* to post at the Tiers board, I think you should take them with a grain of salt in the future... as certain ones are still trying to point fingers at anyone else who is even a teeny bit racy because of bernard's insistance of posting material that was not allowed by tmf. It is one thing to be a little racy on occasion and completely different to obsessively post links that are out of bounds with TMF. The reason I bring this up, is because I noticed there was an effort to point out and problem post some of my raunchy language that i left in posts here and there, by some of the folks that *left* for the yahoo board. Some of those posts of mine were OLD too. So SOME PEOPLE dont have anything better to do besides churn their accounts and tattle tale on others, is how i see it. So, for reference: If the problem post made about the DEN is from a former *Tiers* poster, you might need to look more carefully at the thread before pulling it down. ~j
Or "suck" -- that naughty Snowpimp used the word "suck" -- I heard him --In that vein, can we use the word "hand"?Can I suggest that HAND looks promising here?
Will they pull my 'BOB' joke?
I went to look at the online version of a mag I've seen and look at the first story:http://www.greenmagazine.com/Disclaimer: this is a magazine about moneyFooelle
Do I detect a trend here?DURBAN, South Africa -- Infection with the AIDS virus could make men more amorous, which could make them more likely to pass on the virus, U.S. researchers said on Wednesday. http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,37527,00.html?tw=wn20000712Fooelle
> Do I detect a trend here?>>> DURBAN, South Africa -- Infection with the AIDS>> virus could make men more amorous, which could make>> them more likely to pass on the virus, U.S.>> researchers said on Wednesday...Hmmm...invest in AIDS?
Do I detect a trend here?I meant a trend of sex in business newsFooelle
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |