Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 2
Others have pointed out using ACA subsidies as a potential bridge for health insurance premiums in the years between employer-provided health insurance and Medicare eligibility.

Let's say DeLay Gratification, age 56, has his eye on retiring in 2-3 years. As part of his retirement portfolio, he has a $600,000 taxable portfolio that he wants to draw down $50K/year. (We're ignoring his other assets, Social Security etc etc for the moment)

Let's say the portfolio is split at $250K basis and $350K long-term capital gains.

If by selling his $50K he thus realizes around $35K/year in capital gains each year, that puts he and his wife (Gwen Gigwork, a year younger) well over halfway to the ACA cliff (now just under $69K). In other words, if her part-time gig brings in $20K and he wants to do a part-time thing that ends up netting $14K then...uh-oh...their household income is now $40 over the cliff and they have to immediately pay back their $19K subsidy for that year. Nineteen thousand taxable dollars.

Or

In the two years before retiring, DeLay and Gwen could realize most or all of their long-term capital gains of $350K, pay their (probably) 15% tax (around $50K) and immediately reinvest the remaining $300K. When they then go to tap their now-$550K account in a few years, the $50K annual withdrawal is nearly all basis.

Thus, he and Gwen can both do their thing (each year until Medicare) with a lot more wiggle room, as the ACA cliff is now twice as far off.

Three notes: a) yes, capital gains count in ACA determination of household income; b) the wash rule doesn't apply to stocks sold at a gain; and c) YMMV. I am not a financial professional and this approach should be checked with a reliable source.

Finally, this all presupposes the ACA and its cliff will be around and unchanged for the next x years (in this example, x = 10 for the 55 year-old Gwen)

--sutton

"Any one may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes." - Judge Learned Hand Gregory v. Helvering, 69 F.2d 809, 810 (2d Cir. 1934)
Print the post  

Announcements

The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.