Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
Pro recommended writing covered calls on JNJ, why not write synthetic covered calls. The risk seems to be the same, but the capital invested is much less.

Hmmm …..

I have no idea what Pro does or doesn't suggest. But I find your 'seems to be the same' statement a bit odd. A synthetic covered call (naked put) should have the same 'probability of profit and loss' as a covered call. But one employs 'capital you have' (covered) and the other 'capital you don't have' (naked). That is really the difference between risk and probability, i.e. the 'effect of the outcome' vs the 'likelihood of the outcome'. If you have the capital, just idle (uninvested), the risk isn't much different I guess, but … then the capital requirement is the same.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.