Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
" . .it would have ment at least anohter $1,500 in taxes."

Do you mean taxes you would have had to paid if filing jointly? or tax returns you would have

They would have had to pay more. That's the whole thing behind the "marriage tax", because while I think it still benifits families with only 1 person working, it goes against families where both work. The idea is to make it fair for all, but all is quite a big group of people.

Luckily I don't have to worry about this for a while (famous last words :)

Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.