Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon.
"If one applies basic facts of biology, one (libertarian, democrat, republican, naderite) HAS to admit that a fetus is a human life."I disagree. But that wasn't even my original point. You can still think a fetus is a human life in one sense and NOT think a libertarian state is charged with defending it.-JARI have yet to hear disagreement with a rational explanation.Let's look at the reasoning again from a purely scientific factual basis:What species does a human fetus belong to?Homo sapiens aka humanIs it a whole organism?YesIs it alive?YesErgo, it is human life.If you disagree, at what exact point does a fetus become human life?A fetus which does not have brain activity is not sentient human life but is still human life due to the above conditions being met.I agree that it is debatable whether the state should be charged with defending this nascent human life.wolvy
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |