Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 1
"The suit was over the IRS's ability to regulate all tax preparers"

I read that the suit was that the IRS has no legal authority to make up such a regulation; that it's up to Congress, which did NOT do so.

"Granted, a great many of these preparers do a fine job. But the IRS has been out to improve the quality of tax preparers for a number of years. This mandatory program was their attempt at enforcing some standards on the industry. "

Somehow I doubt their real concern is quality. That's like belieeving the FDA's concern is drug safety ;)
Probably more like a fee raising endeavor or some such tactic.

I doubt CPA's have any higher quality than non-CPA's. Not in my experience, nor in the articles I have read.
I've known a few CPA's who hardly knew basic bookkeeping rules. I would trust Turbo Tax before taking their word for anything.

Also, every year there was a test done of a random sample of CPA's whereby they were given a fake scenario on which to prepare a tax return. The results were WIDELY different. One of them, I remember, ranged from a bottom line of 150K tax due to 50K refund. Nice quality control!

Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.