Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 3
ResN writes,


By the way, Pfau denied having ever referred in any way to fees or expenses in any of his articles or studies. He flat out denied ever suggesting that 1% was a reasonable amount for most folks, and that he included the 1% in his calculations for his new and improved SWR.

</snip>


Here's the subject report, authored by Dr. Pfau and published by Morningstar no less, where he assumes a 1% fee in his retirement withdrawal study. (See Page 9)

http://corporate.morningstar.com/us/documents/targetmaturity...

Each scenario in the analysis is based on a 10,000-run Monte Carlo simulation. Taxes and Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) from the portfolio are ignored. The analysis assumes a 1.0% fee, or negative alpha, that is deducted from the portfolio value annually. This fee is included to account for unavoidable retirement portfolio expenses paid by the investor (e.g., mutual fund fees, advisor fees, account fees, etc.) for investment management.

</snip>


It seems we can now add "documented history as a liar" to his CV.

intercst
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.