Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon.
Rubic,I think WAP offers some potentialadvantages, but it will have to remove whatI consider a fundamental barrier -- cheapaccess to clients via a WAP gatewayI can see the problem that is holding you back -- have you tried working directly with the major vendors such as Nokia or Ericsson? I know that they have had programs in place for quite a while now to encourage developers of WAP-based applications. Somehow, they are providing the necessary support to these application developers, because there is a trickle (or maybe a "drip, drip, drip"?) of applications adapted for WAP coming out.I just don't like the idea of using WAP middleware on technical or economic groundsSince you've had the opportunity to do more in-depth investigation, can you give some of the reasons behind your conclusion? I think it would be interesting for other people to see.As for cellular data vs. WAP, I personally have a hard time seeing cellular data being much more than a toy, with limited market appeal. Consider, for example, the cost to the user, and the effective throughput that one can expect.And I would agree that it will be a while before WAP has a significant following -- in the North American market. If you target the European market, I think the perils of being a pioneer are fewer. To return to the earlier point about developer support from the major vendors, there are already a number of WAP-based applications in the market in Europe. It should be possible to get information about their market acceptance, which should help significantly in reducing risk to you.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |