Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
My question, perhaps missplaced on this board, is why was this stock not identified as a buy in 3/09, south of $30/shr, vs today, 11/12 at $83/shr? Hindsight understood and accepted, but aren't the stock fundementals arguments for WAB the same. Why wasn't this on the radar then? I see this board goes back to 1998 for this stock, so my hat is off to those that were looking at WAB then. I sure would have liked to bought it in 2009.

No criticism intended just looking for the selection process logic that misses this stock over ~$55 growth, while the fundementals remain virtually the same. Further, not the individual investor, but technology driven, analyst rich staff stock ID group.

Please share any thoughts. My experience is in the novice range, so I accept I have much more to learn. Cheers!
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.