Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 1
Say there is an experimental therapy that costs $100K but saves life in only 10% of the patients. Should medical insurance deny spending that money based on probability? How about 50% but costs $1 million? It is their decision... even if the doctor has some (major) influence. If they deny it, you should darn well blame them.


What most countries with public health care systems do is they set a limit in how much they will pay per year of life. If you have a 50% chance of living 6 months longer, and it costs $1m, then it is $1m*/(0.5y*50%)=$4m per life year, and they will say no. People don’t always like it, but it makes sense. It makes sense in any insurance scheme that there is some cap on the liability.

dtb
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.