Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 2
i , too, see the deal much as runninfoolishly does in an earlier post. i put a slightly higher value on seg, but, as i say, more or less the same. now, i differ in one respect: there is no question that current shareholders are getting royally screwed but seg management in this deal. i've been in and out of seg several times over the last few months (profitably, except for stock i bought friday afternoon). right now, the stock is totally controlled by the vrts offer and the price of vrts. however, at some point (say vrts goes to 90 ) seg could in theory be trading in the low 40's. thus making all the talk of "unlocking " shareholder value so much bs. here's my idea: emc. emc (see last barron's) and vrts are cooperative potential competitors. by buying seg, emc woould get 1. a controlling or at least an influential interest in a future competitor 2. own for next to nothing the most dominant disk drive company not named emc. i would think they could pay 75-90 in stock, pick up over 1.5 bn cash, 5-10$ per share worth of this and that,plus, obviously, the vrts. i have no idea wehether anyone is looking at this (investment bankers), but i think it could make a lot of sense.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.