Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon.
Seriously Bryan, is this really what you favor?Absolutely. I'm 100% behind the effort to find the true causes for everything we can study. Aren't you?And shouldn't the people doing the weeding out be experts in the field, i.e., groups like the National Academy of Science?The predominantly atheist NAS? That's like arguing for the fox to weed out only the "sick" chickens . . . you'd end up with an empty hen house. Sorry, they may all be absolutely unbiased, purely logical "Spocks" evaluating the evidence. I doubt it. Every group has a bias. So then the question becomes, "Which bias is more inclined towards the truth?"Bryan
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |