No. of Recommendations: 5
Since the RMDs are based on life expectancy, I doubt the percentage requirements will change by age.

From the above article...

"The Portman-Cardin bill phases in the RMD age increase over several years and would update mortality tables to reflect longer life expectancies."

If you think about it, it would make little sense to raise the RMD age without an actuarial adjustment for current life expectancy to this age group. The most recent update to the Uniform Table was April 2002 when, according to Howard Gleckman, senior writer for Forbes, life expectancy was 1 year less than today.

What will change the RMD percentages by age is the current trend of decreasing life expectancy in the US

This decrease, which the media has been all over of late, is due primarily to increases in drug overdoses (primarily opioids) and suicides in the 25-34 year age group. Life expectancy for those 70 and older has continued to increase, due primarily to advances in diagnostic medical procedures.

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.