Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 1
So chances are the years bonds loose to or beat stocks will be the same years that mortgages do so.
You are perfectly right, however, there could be scenarious like this:
bonds - 5%, mortgages - 6.5%, stocks - 6%
when stocks would beat bonds but not mortgages.

And it's not like stocks just barely beat bonds. The historical rate of return on bonds is somewhere near 5.5% while the return on stocks is closer to 11%.
However, this 5.5% is relatively steady while stocks jump all over the place - 59 vs 41 % is nowhere close what you would expect looking at just 5.5 vs 11.

Anyway, this discussion is pretty much pointless. You cited one fact - that stocks beat bonds 59 to 41 in one year periods. My point is that hitting a higher target is always harder, so the percent of one year periods in which stocks have beaten mortgages has to be lower than 59. Until we get the data we can continue arguing ad infinitum, citing historical averages and other indicators that wouldn't prove anyone of us correct.
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.