No. of Recommendations: 1
So, yes, Virginia, you can eliminate nonsytematic portfolio risk, as defined by Modern Portfolio Theory, with a relatively few stocks. It's just that nonsystematic risk is only a small part of the puzzle. Fifteen stocks is not enough. Thirty is not enough. Even 200 is not enough. The only way to truly minimize the risks of stock ownership is by owning the whole market.


This was the conclusion of the Bernstein study- yet Buffett, the LUK duo (Ian Cumming/Joseph Steinberg), Peter Lynch, and others, probably never came/come anywhere close to owning the market to produce the results they have.

If the benchmark is the S&P 500, it seems like a core position (80-90%) in an Index that mimics the S&P 500 and the remainder invested in individual stocks in an attempt to find one of those 10 superstocks of the decade, would seem like a better strategy. The real risk is not finding one of those 10 superstocks that could supercharge ones returns.



Hohum
Print the post  

Announcements

The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.