Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 7
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday that the Constitution’s prohibition on excessive fines applies to state and local governments, limiting their abilities to impose financial penalties and seize property.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-c...

I've been following this case.

The case at the court involved Tyson Timbs of Marion, Ind., who had his $42,000 Land Rover SUV seized after his arrest for selling a couple hundred dollars’ worth of heroin.

Seizing a $42,000 SUV for a minor drug deal struck me as almost a text book definition of excessive. I was glad to see that the Supreme Court agreed and even happier to see a unanimous decision.

Cases like this are often technically against the property and not against the property owner. Which gives us cases like United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat and 982.34 Pounds of American Paddlefish Caviar.

See https://loweringthebar.net/2019/01/update-paddlefish.html if you want to know what is going on there.

Wally
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.