Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 7
(sorry for barging in, I'm the guy who wrote the post over on the BRK board)

Very nice post!

Just one thing I wanted to point out---my suggested slate was not really
a recommended investment per se, but rather an answer to the unasked
question of "IF you start with the assumption of wanting dividend
paying equities, what's a good way to get a reasonable dividend yield
safely without too much investing savvy", the angle of course simply
stealing most of the picks from Berkshire since it's an above-average crowed of firms.

Truthfully I also didn't consider bonds as an alternative for a few
reasons, notably the usual ones: it's just so darned much harder to do
the research, and difficult and very expensive to purchase the things
when you've done it. But mostly because there can be a lot of "hair"
(complexity) on each one. Personally I'm no corporate bond expert
because of my odd tax situation---only sovereigns make any sense for me.
I pay 30% tax on corporate coupons, 0% on sovereign coupons, and 0%
on cap gains so I almost never even look at corporate bonds.
Otherwise I would probably be a big fan and know a lot more.

As for bonds being a viable alternative to the dividend route, it makes
a lot of sense to me. But I think there might be some even better
deals in the preferred share area at the moment.
My example-du-jour is Wells perpetual preferred series L, which has
an effective yield of 9.8% at the moment ($75 payout on the $1000 face
trading at $765 right now). I like that it's perpetual and effectively
non callable. Sure, dividends might be eliminated for a period, but it
seems like a sweet spot in the capital structure depending on your goals.
I sure wish I'd bought more when they were realy cheap earlier in
the year (I got mine at $359), but ain't that always the case.

Compared to bonds, the preferreds are harder to research because of
the wider range of "usual" unusual conditions, but generally much
cheaper and easier to find and buy when you have done so, so to a first
approximation the pain-in-the-rear factor is probably pretty similar.

One thing I wanted to mention in passing---it's very fair and true to point out
that the choice between equities and bonds is very much a choice
between risk and reward. But, I wanted to point out that this is
not a universal rule--within the equity world, unknown to most folks,
the nitwits who conflate volatility with risk and who expect higher
volatility correlated with higher reward have it backwards. Higher
volatility stocks have lower average returns than lower volatility
stocks, fairly steadily and by a wide margin decade after decade,
and the EMH/CAPM religion folks keep believing otherwise. Amazing!

Back off where I belong on the equity boards...

Jim
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.