Skip to main content
Update
Non-financial boards have been closed.

Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon.

Fool.com | The Motley Fool Community
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
...many federal employees work in Major cities like Washington DC, San Francisco, etc. Whereas the Private workers data doesn't have big city skew as much as Federal workers.

Might it not make much better sense, then, to move a lot of government workers out of the big, expensive coastal cities and into cheaper areas of "flyover country?"

Since the Internet and virtual meetings make it possible for "office work" to be performed anywhere, doesn't it make sense to sell all that valuable government-owned big city real estate and move those expensive big city jobs to smaller, cheaper towns where the real estate and the wages are much cheaper?

With the exception of the cabinet-level and very senior positions, which require availability to the president and congress for questioning, meetings, etc., much of the rest of the Washington, DC, and other large city staff could just as easily perform their work in Dubuque, IA, Detroit, MI, Buffalo, NY, Montgomery, AL, El Paso, TX, Minot, ND, Tupelo, MS, Toledo, OH, Ypsilanti, MI, Topeka, KS, Enid, OK, Tallulah, LA or any other number of cities where jobs and generous government pension money could work miracles on the local economy.

De-centralize the federal government and drain the swamp. Move all those comfy federal jobs (and transfer all those federal employees) out into the heartland, where it would be much cheaper to feed, house and provide offices for them.

It also would serve to reduce the likelihood that the rural, red states would continue to throw elections via the electoral college, since all those re-located federal workers would presumably bring their big city voting habits with them. Moving all the federal workers out into the boonies would help to homogenize the nation and bring us closer together.

;-)

http://boards.fool.com/also-this-study-completely-ignores-lo...
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 3
Yeah! Move some highly educated people to the hinterlands and change small town voting patterns! Who's with us?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Yeah! Move some highly educated people to the hinterlands and change small town voting patterns! Who's with us?

I'm edumacated and moved out to the hinterlands because... I agreed with them more. :-)
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Well if some of the smug, educated people moved from Chicago to those nasty hinterlands, Democrats might lose Illinois as well.

Note to RNC, engage middle class people in rural states, enticing them to move into Democratic strongholds to dilute the vote. Maybe big enticements to get them to move into Detroit areas that will soon house refugees. The DNC would never know what hit them.
Print the post Back To Top