Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 0
Do you really need to change your Stock/Bond allocation as you age?

I have had an allocation of 60/40 for years and years (very well diversified in index funds). When I was younger that allocation undoubtedly seemed a bit too conservative too some, but I liked it as it passed the 'stomach test' and I didn't have a lot of money.
Now that I am older, the 60/40 split is about right according to the conventional wisdom.
As I get older and farther into my retirement, that allocation may seem to be be too aggressive, but I have about a year's worth of living expenses in a money market, so that undoubtedly will help to smooth any bumps.

Anyway, what are your thoughts about changing allocations based on age? (more stocks when you are younger versus more bonds when you are older) versus a middle of the road 60/40 split that you can hold forever?
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.