Skip to main content
Update
The boards are getting a new home!

We're pleased to announce an update is coming to the community boards. We are migrating the boards to a new platform. The site is currently in read-only mode and we will bring it back online as soon as the migration is complete.

Monday, September 26th 8AM EST: The migration is taking longer than expected, we need a few more hours to bring the site back online.


Fool.com | The Motley Fool Community
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 10
Of the $1.2T infrastructure bill, $650B is just adjusting money previously allocated for infrastructure. Only $550B of the spending is newly allocated money. But that doesn't mean $550B in new spending. $200B of that is repurposing unspent COVID relief funds, which means these funds are included in your count twice. We're now down to $3.75T in new spending.

For comparison, just last year Donald Trump signed COVID-related bills for $8.3B, $225B, $2.2T, $483B, and $920B. These bills total up to $3.8T, meaning that to top Biden's spending, we simply have to look at last year. That's before considering that Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) are likely to demand further cuts to the reconciliation bill, so Biden's final spending is likely to be lower. If we want to keep going back to find another year with a similar impact on the budget, we have to go as far back as... 2017. Although it's not a spending bill, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act cut taxes enough to add over $4T to the national debt.


https://electoral-vote.com//
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
That's before considering that Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) are likely to demand further cuts to the reconciliation bill

Start by reducing federal payments to those states *in order to reduce the deficit they oppose*. If they complain about it, that is their problem. If they say EVERYONE gets cuts, tell them no. The others want the stimulus *and* the infrastructure spending because it is necessary to US national security. Or they can choose to be responsible for more bridges failing all over the US--and killing more people.
Print the post Back To Top